Abstract: Objective To explore the value of the treatment of endometrial polyps by intrauterine planing system and traditional plasma bipolar electrotomy system. Methods: the clinical data of 103 patients with intrauterine polyp treated by planing system and plasma bipolar electrotomy were analyzed retrospectively.Results The average operation time of the two groups was significantly longer than that of the planing group. The amount of perfusion fluid used was more in the electric cutting group than the planing group. The incidence of postoperative adhesion was significantly higher in the electrotomy group than in the planing group, and the difference was statistically significant in the above three aspects (P < 0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative uterine perforation and postoperative recurrence between the two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusion The treatment of endometrial polyps by intrauterine planing system is safer, faster and more effective than that by plasma electrotomy system.