高级检索
    朱敏捷, 严峰, 林翔, 白艳乐, 李霞. 齐拉西酮针剂治疗急性精神分裂症激越患者的临床研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(1): 41-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.01.008
    引用本文: 朱敏捷, 严峰, 林翔, 白艳乐, 李霞. 齐拉西酮针剂治疗急性精神分裂症激越患者的临床研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(1): 41-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.01.008
    Clinical study of ziprasidone injection in the treatment of Schizophrenic agitation patients in psychiatric department[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(1): 41-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.01.008
    Citation: Clinical study of ziprasidone injection in the treatment of Schizophrenic agitation patients in psychiatric department[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(1): 41-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.01.008

    齐拉西酮针剂治疗急性精神分裂症激越患者的临床研究

    Clinical study of ziprasidone injection in the treatment of Schizophrenic agitation patients in psychiatric department

    • 摘要: 目的:研究齐拉西酮针剂治疗精神分裂症激越患者的临床效果。方法:本研究采取前瞻性研究,以我院2017年1月到2019年1月治疗的118例精神分裂症激越患者作为研究对象,按照随机分组原则,将以上患者随机分为2组,分别为观察组和对照组,每组59例。观察组患者采取齐拉西酮治疗,对照组采取氟哌啶醇治疗,两组均治疗3d。观察两组患者的PANSS评分、PANSS-EC评分、BARS评分之间的差异,分组两组患者的不良反应水平。结果:观察组患者的治疗总有效率(89.83%)显著高于对照组(74.58%),差异存在有统计学意义(χ2=4.692,P=0.030)。治疗30min以及2h后,两组患者的PANSS-EC以及BARS评分均显著降低,且观察组患者的PANSS-EC(t=3.401,9.812,P<0.05)以及BARS评分(t=2.120,2.519,P<0.05)显著低于对照组;两组患者发生静坐不能(χ2=0.165,P=0.684)、体重增加(χ2=0.521,P=0.470)、口干便秘(χ2=0.179,P=0.672)以及心动过速(χ2=0.202,P=0.657)等不良反应之间的差异不存在统计学意义。结论:齐拉西酮针剂治疗精神分裂症激越患者中,患者的PANSS评分、PANSS-EC以及BARS评分均显著降低,治疗效果显著,建议推广。

       

      Abstract: ob<x>jective: To study the clinical effect of ziprasidone injection in the treatment of psychiatric emergency schizophrenic agitation patients. Methods: In this study, a prospective study was conducted. 118 cases of psychiatric emergency schizophrenic agitation patients treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected as the research ob<x>jects. According to the principle of random grouping, the above patients were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group and the control group, 59 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with ziprasidone and the control group was treated with haloperidol for 3 days. The differences of PANSS score, panss-ec score and bars score between the two groups were observed. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group (89.83%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (74.58%) (χ 2 = 4.692, P = 0.030). After 30 minutes and 2 hours of treatment, the panss-ec and bars scores of the two groups were significantly decreased, and the panss-ec (t = 3.401, 9.812, P < 0.05) and bars scores (t = 2.120, 2.519, P < 0.05) of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group; there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sedentary disability (χ 2 = 0.165, P = 0.684), weight gain (χ 2 = 0.521, P = 0.470), dry mouth constipation (χ 2 = 0.179, P = 0.672) and tachycardia (χ 2 = 0.202, P = 0.657). Conclusion: Ziprasidone injection in the treatment of psychiatric emergency schizophrenic agitation patients, PANSS score, panss-ec and bar score were significantly reduced, the treatment effect was significant, it is recommended to promote

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回