高级检索
    郁芊芊, 秦晓冰, 王红梅, 顾婷, 王玉芹, 韩正祥. TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及阿帕替尼治疗中晚期原发性肝细胞癌的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(12): 907-912. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.12.009
    引用本文: 郁芊芊, 秦晓冰, 王红梅, 顾婷, 王玉芹, 韩正祥. TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及阿帕替尼治疗中晚期原发性肝细胞癌的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(12): 907-912. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.12.009
    Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib Plus Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(12): 907-912. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.12.009
    Citation: Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib Plus Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(12): 907-912. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.12.009

    TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及阿帕替尼治疗中晚期原发性肝细胞癌的疗效及安全性分析

    Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Apatinib Plus Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    • 摘要: 目的 对比经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合卡瑞利珠单抗及阿帕替尼(TACE-Cam-Apa)与TACE联合阿帕替尼(TACE-Apa)治疗中晚期原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效及不良反应。方法 选取徐州医科大学附属医院2019年7月至2021年12月收治的中晚期原发性肝细胞癌患者共76例,其中TACE-Cam-Apa组37例,TACE-Apa组39例。回顾性分析两组患者近期疗效、远期生存和不良反应情况,采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制两组的生存曲线。结果 TACE-Cam-Apa组患者中位总生存期(13.7月vs. 10.6月,P=0.044),中位无进展生存期(7.9月vs. 5.1月,P=0.008)明显长于TACE-Apa组,且客观缓解率(40.5% vs. 17.9%,P=0.030)和疾病控制率(64.9% vs. 43.6%,P=0.030)均高于TACE-Apa组。TACE-Cam-Apa组总不良反应发生率(89.2% vs. 92.3%,P=0.638)和严重不良发生率(21.6% vs. 15.4%, P=0.483)与TACE-Apa组相当。结论 与TACE联合阿帕替尼相比,TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及阿帕替尼在中晚期原发性肝细胞癌患者中临床疗效显著,且安全可控,值得临床推广。

       

      Abstract: ob<x>jective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with Apatinib plus Camrelizumab (TACE-Cam- Apa) versus TACE combined with apatinib (TACE- Apa) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: A total of 76 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received treatment in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from July 2019 to December 2021 were eligible and included in this study ,including 37 patients treated with TACE-Cam-Apa and 39 patients with TACE-Apa;The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) ,ob<x>jective response rate (ORR),disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs) were compared retrospectively between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival time in two groups.Results:The patients in TACE-Cam-Apa group had prolonged OS(median ,13.7 vs. 10.6 months,P=0.046),longer PFS (median,7.9 vs. 5.1 months,P=0.008) and higher ob<x>jective response rate (40.5%vs17.9%,P=0.008) and disease control rate (64.9%vs43.6%,P=0.030) than those in TACE-Apa group.There were no significant differences in the total incidence of adverse events and incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events between two groups ( total incidence of adverse events,89.2% vs. 92.3%,P=0.638;grade 3-4 adverse events,21.6% vs.15.4%,P=0.483).Conclusion:Compared with TACE-Apa,TACE-Cam-Apa could improve significantly the clinical efficacy of patients with an acceptable safety profile in advanced HCC patients.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回