高级检索
    高文佳, 杜秀平. 苹果酸舒尼替尼治疗耐药性胃肠间质瘤的临床观察及其疗效预测因素*[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 221-225.
    引用本文: 高文佳, 杜秀平. 苹果酸舒尼替尼治疗耐药性胃肠间质瘤的临床观察及其疗效预测因素*[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 221-225.
    Clinical Observation of Sunitinib in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Its Predictors of Efficacy*[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2018, 38(4): 221-225.
    Citation: Clinical Observation of Sunitinib in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Its Predictors of Efficacy*[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2018, 38(4): 221-225.

    苹果酸舒尼替尼治疗耐药性胃肠间质瘤的临床观察及其疗效预测因素*

    Clinical Observation of Sunitinib in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Its Predictors of Efficacy*

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨舒尼替尼治疗伊马替尼耐药后胃肠间质瘤(gastrointestinal stromal tumor,GIST)患者的疗效、安全性及其疗效预测因素。方法 搜集舒尼替尼二线治疗的胃肠间质瘤患者32例,所有患者均为伊马替尼耐药或不能耐受后改为舒尼替尼 37.5mg/d持续给药,观察、统计其疗效及其不良反应,并将32例患者分为2组,A组为出现治疗相关性高血压患者,B组为无治疗相关性高血压患者。分析总结其疗效差异。结果 32例患者的客观有效率(RR)=25%,疾病控制率(DCR)=69%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为43周,中位总生存期(OS)为78周;A组及B组的中位PFS分别为74周、26周,中位OS分别为114周、69周,A组的PFS和OS均优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 舒尼替尼二线治疗GIST患者安全有效,舒尼替尼治疗相关性高血压可作为评估疗效及预后的预测因素。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy, safety and predictive factors of efficacy of sunitinib in the treatment of patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Methods Thirty-two patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with sunitinib in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from March 2012 to October 2017 were recruited. All patients who failured to imatinib were treated with sunitinib 37.5mg daily as second—line to observe and measure its efficacy and reactions. Then they were divided into two groups:group A had treatment-related hypertension while group B did not exist. Results Of the 32 patients,RR was 25% and DCR was 69%, the median PFS was 43 weeks while the median OS was 78 weeks. The median PFS in group A and group B were 74 weeks and 26 weeks respectively. The median OS was 114 Week and 69 weeks. Patients in group A had a longer PFS and OS compared with those in group B.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The second-line sunitinib treatment is safe and effective in patients with GIST. Sunitinib-induced arterial hypertension may also serve as biomarker of antitumor efficacy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回