高级检索
    赵星毅. 微创经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定技术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(2): 122-125.
    引用本文: 赵星毅. 微创经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定技术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(2): 122-125.
    Comparison of clinical results between percutaneous and traditional open pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single segment thoracolumbar vertebral fractures[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(2): 122-125.
    Citation: Comparison of clinical results between percutaneous and traditional open pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single segment thoracolumbar vertebral fractures[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(2): 122-125.

    微创经皮与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定技术治疗单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效对比

    Comparison of clinical results between percutaneous and traditional open pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of single segment thoracolumbar vertebral fractures

    • 摘要: 目的:将经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定技术与开放椎弓根螺钉内固定技术诊治单节段胸腰椎骨折的临床治疗效果进行对比。方法:回顾分析2014年05月至2016年10月脊柱胸腰段骨折行椎弓根螺钉内固定术患者30例,其中开放组15例,经皮组15例。比较两组围手术期参数、影像学指标、视觉模拟疼痛评分。结果 这两组病人治疗后都没有产生各种感染、内固定断裂松动、神经脊髓损伤等不良后果。两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(t=0.834,P>0.05);但是手术过程病人的出血量、手术以后的引流量、医院里诊治时间的长短在统计学上都是有各自意义的(t=19.069,P<0.0001;t=35.029, P <0.0001;t=10.394, P <0.0001);术前及术后三月两组VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),术后一周及一月经皮组VAS评分为(1.91±0.27;1.55±0.19),明显低于切开复位组的(2.81±0.37;2.31±0.30)两组VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);术后伤锥后凸角、椎体前缘高度较术前明显恢复,但术后、术后半年、术后十二个月两组所测伤锥后凸角、椎体前缘高度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定技术是治疗胸腰椎骨折的理想微创手术法方法,在胸腰椎骨折的诊治里存在着切口小,出血量少、术后并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得临床推广。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical effects and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and traditional open surgery for the treatment of a single segment thoracolumbar vertebral fractures . Methods:A retrospective study of 15 patients with thoracolumbar fractures without spinal cord or nerve injury from May 2014 to October 201 6, all of which were single segmental vertebral fracture and treated by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. 15 cases of the same period in t he control group were treated by normally open reduction and internal fixation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, radiographic vertebral height, kyphosis Cobb angle and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of two groups were compared between groups. Results: No patients suffered from postoperative infection, internal fixation loosening or breakage , nerve injury or other complications. There were significant differences in blood loss 、postoperative drainage and hospital stay between the two groups (t=19.069, P <0.0001; t=35.029, P <0.0001; t=10.394, P<0.0001) there were no significant differences between two groups in operation time (t=0.834, P>0.05); Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in the group with percutaneous pedicle fixation, the VAS scores at firsr week and first month after operation of the minimally invasive group was 1.91±0.27 and 1.55±0.19 ; the scores of open reduction group was 2.81±0.37 and 2.31±0.30, ther e were significant differences between two groups (P <0.001), but no significant differences existed at 3th months after operation(P>0.05). The radiographic vertebral height and Kyphosis Cobb angle are recovered obviously after surgery , but no significant differences between two groups(P>0.05). Conclusions: Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technology has the characteristics of less injury、less blood loss、less postoperative pain、quicker recovery, and it is an effective method for the single segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurological injury.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回