高级检索
    穆庆霞. 原发性恶性黑色素瘤患者术后心理状况、生活质量调查及影响因素分析[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2019, 39(11): 851-854.
    引用本文: 穆庆霞. 原发性恶性黑色素瘤患者术后心理状况、生活质量调查及影响因素分析[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2019, 39(11): 851-854.
    Investigation of postoperative mental state, living quality in patients with primary malignant melanoma and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2019, 39(11): 851-854.
    Citation: Investigation of postoperative mental state, living quality in patients with primary malignant melanoma and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2019, 39(11): 851-854.

    原发性恶性黑色素瘤患者术后心理状况、生活质量调查及影响因素分析

    Investigation of postoperative mental state, living quality in patients with primary malignant melanoma and its influencing factors

    • 摘要: 目的:研究原发性恶性黑色素瘤(MM)患者术后心理状况与生活质量,分析患者术后心理状况与其生活质量间存在的相关性,找到影响患者术后生活质量的危险因素,为原发性MM患者术后护理计划的制定提供参考。方法: 采用回顾性分析的手段,抽取我院2016年2月至2017年3月接受手术治疗的原发性MM患者60例临床资料,调查患者一般资料,选择汉密尔顿焦虑量表(Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD)、一般自我效能感量表(General self-efficacy scale,GSES)评估其术后4周、12周、24周心理状况,使用用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的生活质量核心量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)评估其术后4周、12周、24周的生活质量,找出患者术后心理状态与生活质量间存在的相关性,采用单因素与多因素的方法分析影响患者术后生活质量的危险因素。结果:术后各时点,患者HAMA评分无明显变化,各时点比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.437,P>0.05);随着时间的延长,患者HAMD评分随之降低,GSES评分随之升高,且各时点比较,差异有统计学意义(F=10.476、12.840,P<0.05);生活质量各维度评分以术后4周最低,术后12周、24周,患者各维度的生活质量评分均较术后4周有所上升;生活质量总分以术后4周最高,其随着时间的延长呈递减趋势,各时点各生活质量维度评分与总分比较,差异有统计学意义(F=19.567、20.710、10.152、8.717、6.421、8.357、43.015,P<0.05);原发性MM患者生活质量与其焦虑、抑郁呈负相关性(r=-0.572、-0.323,P<0.05),与一般效能感呈正相关(r=0.356,P=0.000);经单因素分析发现,文化程度低、高龄、医疗花费高、手术方式为扩大切除、术后接受放化疗、术后皮瓣感觉障碍、术后疼痛明显、术后严重抑郁、术后严重焦虑等是导致患者生活质量差的主要因素(χ2=6.782、4.348、4.290、11.650、3.956、4.319、4.538、10.576、12.918,P<0.05);经多因素分析发现,高龄、文化程度低、医疗花费高、扩大切除、皮瓣感觉障碍、术后疼痛感剧烈、术后心理状况属于中重度抑郁或焦虑是影响原发性MM患者生活质量的独立危险因素(OR=4.600、3.200、3.190、3.250、3.000、3.643、3.250、10.909、9.625,P<0.05)

       

      Abstract: Objective To study the postoperative mental state, living quality in patients with primary malignant melanoma (MM), to analyze the correlation between postoperative mental state and living quality, to find the risk factors of influencing postoperative living quality, and to provide reference for formulating postoperative nursing plan of primary MM patients. Methods The clinical data of 60 primary MM patients with surgical treatment from February 2016 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The general data of patients were investigated. The postoperative 4w, 12w, 24w mental state of patients were evaluated by Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), general self-efficacy scale (GSES). The postoperative 4w, 12w, 24w living quality of patients were evaluated by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The correlation between postoperative mental state and living quality was investigated. The risk factors of influencing postoperative living quality were analyzed by single-factor and multiple-factor analysis. Results After surgery, the HAMA scores of patients had no significant changes, and there was no statistical difference in the HAMA scores at each time (F=0.437,P>0.05); The HAMD scores decreased and GSES scores increased as the time extended, and there was statistical difference in the HAMD and GSES scores at each time (F=10.476、12.840,P<0.05); The postoperative 4w living quality score was the lowest, the scores of postoperative 12w and 24w living quality scores increased compared with postoperative 4w scores; The postoperative 4w total scores of living quality was the highest, but it showed decreased trend as time extended, and there was statistical difference in the living quality scores and total scores at different time (F=19.567, 20.710, 10.152, 8.717、6.421, 8.357, 43.015, P<0.05); The living quality of primary MM patients had negative correlation with anxiety and depression (r=-0.572, -0.323, P<0.05), but had positive correlation with general efficacy (r=0.356, P=0.000); According to single-factor analysis, the low education level, advanced age, high medical cost, surgical procedure with extended resection, postoperative chemoradiotherapy, postoperative flap sensory disorder, obvious postoperative pain, severe postoperative depression, severe postoperative anxiety were main factors of causing poor living quality ( χ2=6.782, 4.348, 4.290, 11.650, 3.956, 4.319, 4.538, 10.576, 12.918, P<0.05); According to multiple-factor analysis, the advanced age, low educational level, high medical cost, extended resection, flap sensory disorder, severe postoperative pain, moderate-severe postoperative depression and anxiety were independent risk factors of influencing living quality in primary MM patients (OR=4.600, 3.200, 3.190, 3.250, 3.000, 3.643, 3.250, 10.909, 9.625, P<0.05). Conclusion The negative mental state of primary MM patients after surgery within half a year is the key factors of decreasing living quality. The advanced age, high medical cost, postoperative flap sensory disorder, extended resection are main factors of influencing living quality. Therefore, as for the patients with symptoms above, it is necessary to provide scientific nursing intervention, so as to improve their living quality.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回