高级检索
    陆芬英, 成翠娥, 李锐, 陆志平, 黄国进, 王斌, 黄夏. ESD治疗老年人结直肠巨大侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(8): 570-574.
    引用本文: 陆芬英, 成翠娥, 李锐, 陆志平, 黄国进, 王斌, 黄夏. ESD治疗老年人结直肠巨大侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(8): 570-574.
    Safety of ESD in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors with diameters >3 cm in the elderly[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(8): 570-574.
    Citation: Safety of ESD in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors with diameters >3 cm in the elderly[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(8): 570-574.

    ESD治疗老年人结直肠巨大侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性研究

    Safety of ESD in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors with diameters >3 cm in the elderly

    • 摘要: 目的 分析ESD治疗老年人直径>3cm的结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性。方法 收集2015.1-2018.12我院行ESD术的直径>3cm的结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤患者的临床资料,将其分成老年组(≥60岁)35例及非老年组(<60岁)30例,统计其病灶部位,病灶类型,病灶大小(cm),病理类型,手术时间(m),住院时间(d),完整切除率,整块切除率及并发症的发生情况,并比较两组是否具有统计学意义。结果 两组患者中,性别,病灶部位,病灶类型,病灶大小,病理类型均无统计学差异。平均手术时间分别为52.1±12.0m及50.8±12.2m,住院时间分别为7.6±1.5d及7.4±1.5d,完整切除率分别为88.6%及90.0%,整块切除率分别为94.3%及93.3%,两组相比均无统计学差异,穿孔发生率及出血发生率亦无统计学差异。术后随访,复发及狭窄发生率在两组人群中均无统计学差异。结论 ESD是治疗老年人直径>3cm的结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的安全有效的方法。

       

      Abstract: Objective To analyze the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors with diameters >3 cm in the elderly. Methods The clinical data of patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors with a diameter of >3 cm performed ESD from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected and divided into 35 elderly patients (≥60 years old) and 30 non-elderly patients (<60 years old). The lesion location , lesion type, lesion size(cm), pathological type, procedural time (m), hospitalization time(d), en bloc resection rate, en bloc RO resection rate and complications were c ompared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in gender, lesion location, lesion type, lesion size, pathological type , average procedural time , hospitalization time , en bloc RO resection rate and en bloc resection rate between the two groups. The average procedural time was 52.1±12.0m and 50.8±12.2m,and the hospitalization time was 7.6±1.5d and 7.4±1.5d, respectively. The en bloc RO resection rate was 88.6% and 90.0%, and the en bloc resection rate was 94.3% and 93.3%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of perforation, bleeding, recurrence and stricture between the two groups .Conclusions ESD is a safe and effective method for the treatment of colorectal laterally spreading tumors with diameters >3 cm in the elderly.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回