[1]蔡俊,张亮,冯新民,等. 椎间孔镜TESSYS技术治疗游离型腰椎间盘脱出临床效果评价[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(07):472-474.
 CAI Jun,ZHANG Liang,FENG Xinming,et al.Clinical evaluation of transforaminal endoscopic spine system in the treatment of sequestered lumbar disc herniation[J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):472-474.
点击复制

 椎间孔镜TESSYS技术治疗游离型腰椎间盘脱出临床效果评价()
分享到:

《徐州医科大学学报》[ISSN:2096-3882/CN:32-1875/R]

卷:
37
期数:
2017年07期
页码:
472-474
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical evaluation of transforaminal endoscopic spine system in the treatment of sequestered lumbar disc herniation
作者:
蔡俊张亮冯新民杨建东王永祥*
 江苏省苏北人民医院骨科,江苏扬州225000
Author(s):
 CAI Jun ZHANG Liang FENG Xinming YANG Jiandong WANG Yongxiang*
 Department of Orthopedics, Subei People′s Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225000, China
关键词:
 游离型腰椎间盘脱出椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术
Keywords:
 sequestered lumbar disc herniation transforaminal endoscopy discectomy
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 的评价椎间孔镜TESSYS(transforaminal endoscopic spine system)技术治疗游离型腰椎间盘脱出的手术技巧和临床效果。方法回顾性分析68例行椎间孔镜TESSYS技术治疗的游离型腰椎间盘脱出患者的临床资料,术后按MacNab标准评估手术效果,对手术前后腰腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分进行比较。结果68例患者平均随访1年,患者术前腰腿痛VAS评分为(8.11±2.23)分,术后3个月为(2.33±1.34)分,术后1年为(1.26±0.73)分,术后3个月、1年VAS评分均较术前明显改善(P<0.01)。术前ODI评分为(66.50±18.23)分,术后3个月为(25.13±11.32)分,术后1年为(12.23±6.17)分,术后3个月、1年ODI评分均较术前明显改善(P<0.01)。根据改良MacNab标准,优40例(59%),良23例(34%),可3例(4%),差2例(3%),优良率为93%。结论椎间孔镜TESSYS 技术用于治疗游离型腰椎间盘脱出具有创伤小、恢复快和疗效确切的特点,正确的靶向穿刺和术中的仔细探查是手术成功的关键。
Abstract:
 ObjectiveTo evaluate the surgical techniques and clinical results of transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) in the treatment of sequestered lumbar disc herniation. MethodsA total of 68 patients with sequestered lumbar disc herniation who were treated with TESSYS were enrolled into the current study and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. The efficacy of the surgery was assessed according to MacNab criteria, while their visual analog scores (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated. ResultsAll the patients were followed up for one year on average. Their VAS was (2.33±1.34) three months after surgery and (1.26±0.73) one year after surgery, which were remarkably improved compared with the VAS before surgery(8.11±2.23) (P<0.01). Their ODI was (25.13±11.32) three months after surgery and (12.23±6.17) one year after surgery, which were remarkably improved compared with the ODI before surgery (66.5±18.23) (P<0.01). According to MacNab criteria, the outcome was excellent in 40 patients (59%), good in 23 patients (34%), fair in 3 patients (4%) and poor in 2 patients (3%), with an overall excellence rate of 93%. ConclusionsTESSYS is an effective method to treat sequestered lumbar disc herniation, with less trauma, better recovery and definite therapeutic efficacy. Both correct targeting puncture and careful exploration during operation are essential.

参考文献/References:

 [1]Lakko lS, Bhatia C, Taranu R, et al. Efficacy of less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011,93(11):1518-1523.
[2]Linzer P, Filip M, Jurek P, et al. Comparison of biochemical response between the minimally invasive and standard open posterior lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2016,50(1):16-23.
[3]Mitha AP, Hsu FD, Scott JN, et al. Sequestered intradural lumbar disc [J]. Can J Neurol Sci, 2009,36(6):776-778.
[4]Kuzeyli K, Cakir E, Usul H, et al. Posterior epidural migration of lumbar disc fragments: report of three cases [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003,28(3):E64-E67.
[5]Bonaroti EA, Welch WC. Posterior epidural migration of an extruded lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equina syndrome. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998,23(3):378-381.
[6]张国伟,周承涛,张光辉,等.游离型腰椎间盘突出的MRI表现[J]. 临床放射学杂志,2004,23(9):798-800.
[7]Kim MS, Park KW, Hwang C, et al. Recurrence rate of lumbar disc herniation after open discectomy in active young men [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(1):24-29.
[8]Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, et al.Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008,33(9):973-978.
[9]Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, et al. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Eur Spine J, 2010,19(2):181-204.
[10]Schaufele MK, Hatch L, Jones W. Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar intervertebral disc herniations [J]. Pain Physician, 2006,9(4):361-366.
[11]Xin G, Shi-Sheng H, Hai-Long Z. Morphometric analysis of the YESS and TESSYS techniques of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy [J]. Clin Anat, 2013,26(6):728-734.
[12]Cho JY, Lee SH, Lee HY. Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique [J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2011,54(5-6):214-218.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙秀媛,李海玲,朱相华,等.rTMS及MECT在不同时间点对抑郁症疗效和BDNF的影响及相关性研究[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):262.
[2]代春潇,宋远见,张云山,等. 大鼠MKK7真核表达质粒的构建及其在COS7细胞中转染效率[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):211.
  [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):211.
[3]张端强,丁晓帆,杨丹丹,等. 加综合征患者复发影响因素研究[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):216.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):216.
[4]王立新,袁峰*,郭开今,等. 纳米羟基磷灰石/细菌纤维素对兔骨髓间充质干细胞黏附及成骨分化的影响[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):221.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):221.
[5]李海青,曹猛,江涛,等. PD-L1在结直肠癌中的表达及其临床意义[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):227.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):227.
[6]刘兵,唐明生,李苹,等. 用随机森林模型分析胃癌高危人群干预效果的影响因素*[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):231.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):231.
[7]周新宇?,牛坚,曹宽,等. Tim3在炎症反应调控及对肝细胞损伤保护机制研究[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):236.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):236.
[8]商书霞,宋光耀*,刘晓耕,等. 血清胆红素和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶与糖尿病患者非酒精性脂肪肝的相关性研究[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):245.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):245.
[9]李新文1,巩尊科2,王世雁2,等. RS在非痴呆型血管性认知障碍评定中的临床应用研究[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):248.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):248.
[10]樊叶,韩维维,何帮顺,等.替格瑞洛含药血清对人胃黏膜上皮细胞GES-1的损伤作用[J].徐州医科大学学报,2017,37(04):252.
 [J].Journal of Xuzhou Medical University,2017,37(07):252.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金(BK20141281);江苏省第五期“333人才工程”项目(BRA2016159);江苏省第十三批“六大人才工程项目”(WSW-133);扬州市社会发展科技攻关项目(YZ2011082);江苏省科技支撑计划——社会发展项目(BE2013911)
*通信作者,E-mail:wyx918spine@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-14