高级检索
    堵晓英. 妊娠期糖尿病产妇产后恢复情况与新生儿喂养方式及个体化营养锻炼的相关性研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2019, 39(8): 602-605.
    引用本文: 堵晓英. 妊娠期糖尿病产妇产后恢复情况与新生儿喂养方式及个体化营养锻炼的相关性研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2019, 39(8): 602-605.
    DU Xiaoying , CHEN Daozhen. Correlation between postpartum recovery of gestational diabetes maternal maternal feeding and individualized nutrition training[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2019, 39(8): 602-605.
    Citation: DU Xiaoying , CHEN Daozhen. Correlation between postpartum recovery of gestational diabetes maternal maternal feeding and individualized nutrition training[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2019, 39(8): 602-605.

    妊娠期糖尿病产妇产后恢复情况与新生儿喂养方式及个体化营养锻炼的相关性研究

    Correlation between postpartum recovery of gestational diabetes maternal maternal feeding and individualized nutrition training

    • 摘要: 目的:研究妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)产妇产后恢复情况与新生儿喂养方式及个体化营养锻炼的相关性。方法:选取妊娠期糖尿病产妇130例作为观察对象,依据是否是采用母乳喂养,将其分为母乳喂养组(70例)和非母乳喂养组(60例)。同时,依据是否进行个性化营养锻炼,将母乳喂养组分为个性化营养锻炼组(A组,n=35例)和常规锻炼组(B组,n=35例),将非母乳喂养组分为个性化营养锻炼组(C组,30例)和常规锻炼组组(D组,30例)。比较4组的运动功能恢复情况、糖代谢恢复情况以及体质恢复情况。结果:在下肢最大肌力(MS)、股骨颈抗骨折能力(FS)、膝关节活动方位(R)指标方面,A组和B组高于C组和D组(P<0.05)。A组高于B组(P<0.05)。C组高于D组(P<0.05)。在膝关节损伤程度(ED)方面,A组和B组均低于C组和D组(P<0.05);A组低于B组(P<0.05);C组低于D组(P<0.05)。A、B、C、D组的糖代谢恢复正常比分别为97.14%、74.29%、73.33%、46.67%,A组高于B组、C组和D组(P<0.05)。在糖耐量受损方面,A组低于D组(P<0.05),A组与B组和C组无统计学差异(P>0.05),B组与C组也无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在空腹血糖耐受损方面,各组无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在MBI指数方面,A组和B组干预后均低于C组和D组(P<0.05);A组低于B组(P<0.05);C组低于D组(P<0.05)。结论:新生儿纯母乳喂养方式以及个性化营养锻炼的应用对于促进妊娠期糖尿病产妇恢复方面有重要的价值,值得应用和推广。

       

      Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between postpartum recovery of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and neonatal feeding and individualized nutrition exercise. METHODS: A total of 130 pregnant women with gestational diabetes admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were enrolled. According to whether breastfeeding was used, they were divided into breast-fed group (70 cases) and non-breastfeeding. Group (60 cases). At the same time, according to whether to carry out personalized nutrition exercise, the breast-fed components were personalized nutrition exercise group A (35 cases) and regular exercise group B group 35 cases), and non-breastfeeding components were personalized nutrition exercise group C. (30 cases) and routine exercise group D (30 cases). The recovery of motor function, the recovery of glucose metabolism and the recovery of constitution were compared among the four groups A, B, C and D. RESULTS:In terms of lower extremity maximum muscle strength (MS), femoral neck anti-fracture ability (FS) and knee joint motion location (R) indexes, group A and group B were higher than group C and group D (P < 0.05). Group A was higher than group B (P < 0.05). Group C was higher than group D (P < 0.05). In terms of the degree of knee injury (ED), group A and group B were lower than group C and group D (P < 0.05). Group A was lower than group B (P < 0.05). Group C was lower than group D (P < 0.05). The ratio of glucose metabolism returning to normal in group A, B, C and D was 97.14%, 74.29%, 73.33% and 46.67%, respectively, which was higher in group A than in group B, C and D (P < 0.05). In terms of impaired glucose tolerance, group A was lower than group D (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference between group A, group B and group C (P > 0.05), nor was there any statistical difference between group B and group C (P > 0.05). In terms of impaired fasting glucose tolerance, there was no statistical difference between the groups (P > 0.05). In terms of MBI index, both group A and group B were lower than group C and group D after intervention (P < 0.05). Group A was lower than group B (P < 0.05). Group C was lower than group D (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of exclusive breastfeeding and personalized nutrition training for newborns is of great value in promoting maternal recovery in gestational diabetes and is worthy of application and promotion.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回