高级检索
    陈泽宇, 周饶饶, 陈仁富, 陈家存, 温儒民, 王军起, 李望, 薛松, 朱海涛. 新型螺旋热膨胀前列腺支架与经尿道等离子前列腺电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的疗效比较[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(9): 665-668. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.09.009
    引用本文: 陈泽宇, 周饶饶, 陈仁富, 陈家存, 温儒民, 王军起, 李望, 薛松, 朱海涛. 新型螺旋热膨胀前列腺支架与经尿道等离子前列腺电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的疗效比较[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2020, 40(9): 665-668. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.09.009
    Comparison of effect between new spiral thermo-expandable prostate stent and transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate for elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(9): 665-668. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.09.009
    Citation: Comparison of effect between new spiral thermo-expandable prostate stent and transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate for elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(9): 665-668. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.09.009

    新型螺旋热膨胀前列腺支架与经尿道等离子前列腺电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的疗效比较

    Comparison of effect between new spiral thermo-expandable prostate stent and transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate for elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨新型螺旋热膨胀前列腺支架置入术与经尿道等离子前列腺电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生患者的疗效情况.方法 回顾性分析2017年5月—2018年10月徐州医科大学附属医院泌尿外科25例高龄(年龄>75岁)前列腺增生患者的临床资料和治疗效果,根据手术方式将其分为支架组10例,经尿道等离子前列腺电切术(PKRP)组15例.比较2组患者手术时间及住院时间、术前及术后3、12个月国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率(MFR)、残余尿量(RUV)、疼痛评分(VAS)、生活质量评分(QOL),并随访术后不良反应.结果 所有患者术后均能恢复自主排尿,与PKRP组比较支架组手术时间〔(30.3±6.9)min vs(92.0±27.3)min〕及住院时间〔(3.2±1.1)d vs(7.3±1.9)d〕均明显缩短且疼痛评分更低〔(2.8±0.6)分vs(4.2±1.2)分〕;术后3个月复查支架组在MFR改善更明显〔(13.8±2.0)ml·s-1 vs(15.2±1.6)ml·s-1〕,IPSS、RUV、QOL改善相似,差异无统计学意义,而在术后1年随访时支架组MFR、RUV、IPSS改善更明显(P<0.05).2组患者术后未发生尿失禁、前列腺电切综合征、支架移位等严重并发症.结论 2种术式近期疗效相似,而前列腺支架组术后1年时疗效更好,可作为不能耐受全身麻醉的高龄良性前列腺增生患者的首选治疗方法.

       

      Abstract: objective: To compare the efficacy of Memokath transurethal spiral thermo-expandable prostatic stent implantation and transurethral partial prostate resection for elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical data and treatment effect of 25 patients with BPH who were older than 75 years old in the Department of Urology, Xuzhou Medical University Hospital from May 2017 to October 2018, including 10 cases of prostate stent group, transurethral Plasma kinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) 15 cases. The operation time and hospitalization time of the two groups were compared. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume (RUV), pain score (VAS), and quality of life (QOL) were measured before surgery and postoperative 3 and 12 months. Postoperative complications were collected. Result All patients were able to resume spontaneous urination after surgery, and the stent group was in operation time (30.3±6.9) min vs. (92.0±27.3)min and hospitalization time (3.2 ± 1.1) d vs. (7.3 ± 1.9) d were significantly shorter and the VAS was lower (2.8 ± 0.6) vs. (4.2 ± 1.2), The Qmax was more obvious in the stent group after 3 months of operation (13.7±1.9) ml·s-1vs (15.2±1.6) ml·s-1, and the improvement of IPSS, RUV and QOL was similar, and there was no statistical difference. The Qmax, RUV and IPSS of the stent group were significantly improved after the follow-up of the first year (P<0.05). There were no serious complications such as prostate resection syndrome and stent displacement in the two groups

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回