高级检索
    王宇超, 王飞通, 刘星, 刘斌. 三镜治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的疗效研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2021, 41(2): 132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2021.02.011
    引用本文: 王宇超, 王飞通, 刘星, 刘斌. 三镜治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的疗效研究[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2021, 41(2): 132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2021.02.011
    Retrospective study on the clinical effect of three endoscopies combination in the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and extrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2021, 41(2): 132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2021.02.011
    Citation: Retrospective study on the clinical effect of three endoscopies combination in the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and extrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2021, 41(2): 132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2021.02.011

    三镜治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的疗效研究

    Retrospective study on the clinical effect of three endoscopies combination in the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and extrahepatic bile duct stones

    • 摘要: 目的 比较分析腹腔镜下胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)联合腹腔镜下胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)与LC联合内镜下逆行胰胆管造影/内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开取石术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy,ERCP/EST)治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的疗效.方法 收集2015年1月至2018年8月在徐州医科大学附属医院因胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石住院手术治疗患者的资料,按治疗方式分为LC+LCBDE组或ERCP/EST+LC组,根据纳入和排除标准最终纳入194例.比较2组患者的手术前后有关情况、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、近期及远期并发症发生率等指标.结果 2组患者在年龄、性别、白细胞、总胆红素、间接胆红素、谷草转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶、白蛋白、胆总管直径、慢性合并症、腹部手术史等方面无明显差异(P>0.05).LC+LCBDE组的手术时间大于ERCP/EST+LC组(P<0.01).LC+LCBDE组平均住院费小于ERCP/EST+LC组(P<0.05).LC+LCBDE组远期并发症发生率小于ERCP/EST+LC组(P<0.05).2组患者在平均住院时间及术后近期并发症发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC作为治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石的2种主要微创措施,均有良好的治疗效果.LC+LCBDE住院费用较低、性价比高,而且保护了Oddi括约肌的功能,降低了远期并发症的发生率,对于合适的患者应该是首选的手术方式.

       

      Abstract: objective To analyze the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), endoscopic cholangiopancreatography/ endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP/EST) combined with LC for patients with cholecystolithiasis and extrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods The clinical data of patients with cholecystolithiasis and extrahepatic bile duct stones who were treated in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2015 to August 2018 were analyzed. The operation time, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, rate of residual stones, incidence of complications and recurrence of stones were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, WBC, TBIL, DBIL, AST, ALT,diameter of common bile, chronic diseases and abdominal surgery history. The operation time (150.68±55.23) min VS (126.81±29.10) min in the LC+LCBDE group was larger than that in the ERCP/EST+LC group, but the hospitalization expenses (37193.85±10522.50) VS (40541.04±8881.93) and the incidence of long-term complications (17.4%)VS(29.4%) was smaller than that in the ERCP/EST+LC group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the hospital stay (15.45±7.14) d VS (14.71±5.09) d and the incidence of postoperative complications (10.9%)VS(14.7%) (P>0.05). Conclusions Both LC+LCBDE and ERCP/EST+LC are effective methods for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis with extrahepatic bile duct stones. LC+LCBDE has lower cost and higher cost performance. In addition, it protects the function of the sphincter of the nipple, reduces the incidence of long-term complications, and is of higher safety. It should be the preferred surgical method for appropriate patients

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回