高级检索
    陈小荣, 曹爱红. HRCT定量参数预测亚实性结节肺腺癌病理侵袭性的价值[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(6): 424-428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.06.007
    引用本文: 陈小荣, 曹爱红. HRCT定量参数预测亚实性结节肺腺癌病理侵袭性的价值[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2022, 42(6): 424-428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.06.007
    The value of quantitative parameters of HRCT to predict the pathological invasiveness of subreal nodule lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(6): 424-428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.06.007
    Citation: The value of quantitative parameters of HRCT to predict the pathological invasiveness of subreal nodule lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2022, 42(6): 424-428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2022.06.007

    HRCT定量参数预测亚实性结节肺腺癌病理侵袭性的价值

    The value of quantitative parameters of HRCT to predict the pathological invasiveness of subreal nodule lung adenocarcinoma

    • 摘要: 目的探讨HRCT定量参数对以亚实性结节(SSN)形式存在的浸润性腺癌(IAC)与微浸润腺癌(MIA)和浸润前病变(PIL)的鉴别价值。方法选取2017年6月—2021年6月于徐州医科大学第二附属医院经手术病理证实且术前CT表现为SSN的周围型肺腺癌患者116例,收集临床资料进行回顾性分析。上述患者共SSN 116个,其中纯磨玻璃结节(pGGN)56个、部分实性结节(PSN)60个。根据预后情况,将患者分为2组:PIL/MIA组(n=65)和IAC组(n=51)。采用单因素和二元logistic回归分析,确定IAC的独立危险因素。结果单因素分析显示,2组患者平均CT值、CT差值、质量、体积、最大CT值、3D长径比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。二元logistic回归和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析表明,质量和CT差值是IAC的独立危险因素。CT差值诊断IAC的阈值为420.83 HU(AUC 0.873,灵敏度82.4%,特异度81.5%),质量诊断IAC的阈值为513.89 mg(AUC 0.888,灵敏度72.5%,特异度92.3%)。CT差值联合质量诊断IAC的AUC值达0.944,灵敏度为90.2%,特异度为89.2%。结论CT差值和质量是预测SSN侵袭性的可靠指标。CT差值联合质量预测其侵袭性的价值较单独使用CT差值或质量更高。

       

      Abstract: ob<x>jective To explore the role of quantitative HRCT parameters in identifying invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and pre-invasive lesions (PIL) in the form of lung ground glass nodules (SSNs)。Methods Reviewing the peripheral lung adenocarcinoma confirmed by SSNs from June 2017 to June 2021, including 116 SSNs removed in 116 patients: 56 pure hairy glass nodules, 5mm in 60partial solid nodules, divided into two groups: PIL / MIA: atypical adenoma hyperplasia (AAH) (=6), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (=11) and MIA (=48), and group IAC, including 51 cases.Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for IAC。 Results Univariate analysis showed that SSNs nature, CT mean, CT D-value, mass, volume, CT maximum, 3D diameter difference (all P <0.001).Binary ligistic regression and subject working feature analysis showed that SSNs mass, CT D-value,were all independent risk factors for IAC, the threshold for CT difference diagnostic IAC was 420.825HU, and 513.893mg for quality diagnostic IAC.The AUC value of combined CT difference and quality diagnosis IAC were 0.944, sensitivity of 90.2%, specificity of 89.2%.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回