高级检索

    CT征象联合血清异常凝血酶原对孤立性肝癌微血管侵犯的预测价值

    Predictive value of CT signs combined with serum abnormal prothrombin for microvascular invasion in patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨CT征象联合血清异常凝血酶原(PIVKA-Ⅱ)对孤立性肝癌微血管侵犯(MVI)的预测价值。方法 选取2021年1月—2023年2月在重庆市开州区人民医院接受外科手术治疗的97例孤立性肝癌患者,术前均接受CT检查和血清PIVKA-Ⅱ检测。以术后病理结果为金标准,将其分为MVI组和未发生MVI(n-MVI)组。先进行单因素分析,然后采用多因素logistic分析孤立性肝癌发生MVI的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评价相关CT征象联合血清PIVKA-Ⅱ对孤立性肝癌发生MVI的预测效能。结果 术后病理证实97例孤立性肝癌MVI发生率为30.07%。MVI组肿瘤直径、肿瘤边缘、包膜类型、晕征、血清PIVKA-Ⅱ与n-MVI组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic分析显示:肿瘤边缘(OR=2.236)、包膜类型(OR=3.075)、晕征(OR=2.129)和血清PIVKA-Ⅱ(OR=2.528)是MVI发生的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示:肿瘤边缘、包膜类型、晕征、血清PIVKA-Ⅱ单独预测MVI的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.715、0.763、0.601、0.759,上述CT征象联合血清PIVKA-Ⅱ预测MVI的AUC为0.853(95%CI:0.739~0.967),敏感度、特异度和准确度为83.87%、78.79%、80.41%。结论 孤立性肝癌MVI患者具有肿瘤边缘欠光滑、包膜不完整、晕征等CT征象,血清PIVKA-Ⅱ明显升高,上述CT征象联合血清PIVKA-Ⅱ能有效预测MVI。

       

      Abstract: Objective To explore the predictive value of CT signs combined with serum abnormal plasminogen (PIVKA-Ⅱ) on microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods A total of 97 patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment in Chongqing Kaizhou District People's Hospital from January 2021 to February 2023 were selected. All the patients underwent CT examination and serum PIVKA-Ⅱ test before surgery. Based on postoperative pathological results as the gold standards, they were divided into two groups: a MVI group and a non-MVI (n-MVI) group. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by multivariate logistic analysis to screen out the risk factors for MVI in patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the predictive efficiency of CT signs combined with serum PIVKA-Ⅱ for MVI in patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma. Results According to postoperative pathological results, the incidence of MVI was 30.07% among 97 patients with isolated hepatocellular carcinoma. Compared with the n-MVI group, the MVI group showed statistical differences in tumor diameter, tumor margin, envelope type, halo sign, and serum PIVKA-Ⅱ (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that tumor margin (OR=2.236), envelope type (OR=3.075), halo sign (OR=2.129), and serum PIVKA-Ⅱ (OR=2.528) were the independent risk factors for the development of MVI (P<0.05). The ROC curves presented that the area under the curve (AUC) of tumor margin, envelope type, halo sign, and serum PIVKA-Ⅱ alone for predicting MVI was 0.715, 0.763, 0.601, and 0.759, respectively, whereas the AUC of the above CT signs combined with serum PIVKA-Ⅱ for predicting MVI was 0.853 (95% CI: 0.739-0.967), with a sensitivity of 83.87%, a specificity of 78.79%, and an accuracy of 80.41%. Conclusions Isolated hepatocellular carcinoma patients with MVI present less smooth tumor margins, incomplete envelope, halo sign and other CT signs, with remarkably increased serum PIVKA-Ⅱ. The above mentioned CT signs combined with serum PIVKA-Ⅱ is effective in predicting MVI.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回