高级检索

    PNI和SII对TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗肝癌患者的预后评估

    Prognostic value of PNI and SII in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with camrelizumab and tyrosine kinase inhibitors

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨预后营养指数(PNI)和系统免疫炎症指数(SII)对接受经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合卡瑞利珠单抗及酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)患者的预后评估价值。方法 对2018年10月—2022年9月徐州医科大学附属医院收治的140例接受TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及TKI治疗的uHCC患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定PNI和SII的最佳截断值,卡方检验评估不同水平PNI、SII与患者临床病理特征的关系,并利用Cox比例风险模型分析影响患者预后的危险因素。通过Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,ROC曲线用于评价PNI、SII及PNI-SII对接受TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及TKI治疗的uHCC患者预后的预测效能。结果 PNI最佳截断值为46.05,SII最佳截断值为303.09,PNI、SII的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.744、0.778,敏感度分别为78.6%、81.4%,特异度分别为70.0%、61.4%。单因素和多因素分析结果显示,低PNI、高SII是uHCC患者无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。生存分析显示,高PNI组、低SII组分别较低PNI组、高SII组有更长的中位PFS和OS(P<0.05);PNI-SII评分0分组的生存情况显著优于2分组(P<0.05)。PNI-SII的AUC为0.854,优于单独PNI和SII(P<0.05)。结论 PNI、SII可作为接受TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗及TKI治疗的uHCC患者有效的预后评估指标,PNI-SII联合相较于单独指标预测效能更高。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) who received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with camrelizumab and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods A total of 140 uHCC patients who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and received TACE combined with camrelizumab and TKI from October 2018 to September 2022 were enrolled and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to determine the optimal cutoff values for PNI and SII. The relationship between different PNI and SII, and clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated using the chi-square test. Cox proportional hazards models were established to analyze the risk factors affecting patient prognosis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and ROC curves were used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of PNI, SII, and the combined PNI-SII on prognosis in uHCC patients treated with TACE combined with camrelizumab and TKI. Results The optimal cutoff values for PNI and SII were 46.05 and 303.09, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for PNI and SII was 0.744 and 0.778, respectively, with sensitivities of 78.6% and 81.4%, and specificities of 70.0% and 61.4%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that low PNI and high SII were independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients (P<0.05). According to survival analysis, the high PNI group and low SII group showed significant increases in median PFS and OS, compared with the low PNI group and high SII group (P<0.05). Patients in the PNI-SII score 0 group had significantly better survival outcomes than those in the score 2 group (P<0.05). The AUC for the combined PNI-SII was 0.854, which was superior to PNI or SII alone (P<0.05). Conclusions Both PNI and SII are effective prognostic indicators for uHCC patients receiving TACE combined with camrelizumab and TKI treatment. The combined PNI-SII offers higher predictive efficacy compared with the individual indices.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回