高级检索

    一期双侧膝关节内侧单间室置换的安全性研究

    Safety of one-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨一期双侧膝关节内侧单间室置换(OB-UKA)的安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年1月—2023年1月在南京鼓楼医院进行OB-UKA手术的35例膝关节骨性关节炎患者的临床资料,并在同期行单侧膝关节内侧单间室置换(UKA)和单侧全膝关节置换(TKA)的患者中选择年龄、性别匹配者各35例作为对照,比较3组患者手术相关指标(手术时间、总失血量、住院时间)、营养状态〔血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白(ALB)〕、炎症指标〔白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)〕、疼痛程度、膝关节功能评分及并发症。结果 术前3组间一般资料的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。OB-UKA组手术时间较UKA组和TKA组长(P<0.05),总失血量与TKA组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),明显高于UKA组(P<0.05);术后OB-UKA组和UKA组Hb、ALB比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);OB-UKA组和TKA组术后WBC、CRP比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);OB-UKA组术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)与UKA组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),明显低于TKA组(P<0.05);OB-UKA组美国特种外科医院膝关节功能评分(HSS)与UKA组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但明显高于TKA组(P<0.05);UKA组、OB-UKA组并发症发生率均为2.9%,低于TKA组并发症发生率(5.7%)(P<0.05)。结论 OB-UKA与UKA相比,手术时间延长,失血量增加,但术后营养相关指标与UKA水平相似,疼痛程度较低,膝关节功能评分与UKA相当。此外,OB-UKA术后炎症相关指标与TKA水平相似,围术期并发症发生率低于TKA,且与UKA相似。OB-UKA可以作为双膝内侧间室退变患者的安全有效的首选术式。

       

      Abstract: Objective To explore the safety of one-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OB-UKA). Methods A total of 35 patients who underwent OB-UKA at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Meanwhile, another 35 age- and gender-matched patients each from those who underwent unilateral UKA and unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were selected as controls. The three groups were compared for surgery-related indicators (operation time, total blood loss, and the length of hospitalization stay), nutritional status 〔hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin (ALB)〕, inflammatory markers 〔white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP)〕, pain levels, knee function scores, and complications. Results There were no statistical differences in general information among the three groups before surgery. The OB-UKA group showed longer operation time than the UKA and TKA groups (P<0.05). The OB-UKA group also presented significantly higher total blood loss than the UKA group, without statistical difference compared with the TKA group (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in postoperative Hb and ALB between the OB-UKA and UKA groups (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in postoperative WBC and CRP between the OB-UKA and TKA groups(P>0.05). The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score in the OB-UKA group showed no significant difference from the UKA group but was significantly lower than the TKA group (P<0.05). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee function score of the OB-UKA group was comparable to the UKA group but significantly higher than the TKA group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the UKA and OB-UKA groups was 2.9% each, both lower than 5.7% observed in the TKA group (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with UKA, OB-UKA is associated with longer operation time and increased blood loss. However, its postoperative nutritional indicators are similar to those of the UKA group, with reduced pain levels and comparable functional outcomes. Additionally, postoperative inflammatory markers in the OB-UKA group are similar to those in the TKA group, with a perioperative complication rate comparable to UKA and lower than TKA. OB-UKA can be considered a safe and effective surgical option for patients with bilateral compartment degeneration.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回