高级检索

    前列腺健康指数联合PI-RADS评分在血清前列腺特异性抗原4~10 μg/L前列腺癌患者中的诊断价值

    Diagnostic value of prostate health index combined with PI-RADS score in prostate cancer patients with serum prostate-specific antigen 4-10 μg/L

    • 摘要: 目的 评价血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)位于灰区时(4~10 μg/L)前列腺健康指数(PHI)、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分诊断前列腺癌的价值,并建立两者联合诊断前列腺癌的预测模型。方法 收集2022年11月—2023年12月在徐州医科大学附属医院泌尿外科行经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的131例患者(血清PSA 4~10 μg/L)的临床资料,根据病理结果分为前列腺癌组(35例)和良性前列腺增生组(96例)。应用二元logistic回归分析评估各变量对前列腺癌的预测价值,建立PHI联合PI-RADS诊断前列腺癌的预测模型Logit(P)。建立各独立变量和预测模型Logit(P)的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,比较各因素的曲线下面积,选取各因素和预测模型Logit(P)的最佳截断值,评估其诊断效能。结果 2组患者的年龄、总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)、游离前列腺特异性抗原比值(%fPSA)、前列腺体积差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PHI、前列腺特异性抗原同源异构体2(p2PSA)、前列腺健康指数密度(PHID)的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。tPSA、%fPSA、p2PSA、PHI、PHID诊断前列腺癌的曲线下面积分别为0.565、0.634、0.771、0.812、0.802。PHI与PI-RADS评分联合的预测模型为:Logit(P)=1.117×PI-RADS评分+0.086×PHI-7.886,预测模型Logit(P)的ROC曲线下面积为0.848,显著高于各单一指标,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PHI在血清PSA 4~10 μg/L的前列腺癌患者中诊断效能优于传统的前列腺肿瘤标志物,联合PI-RADS评分建立的联合预测模型的诊断效能高于单一指标,可有效降低前列腺癌的漏诊率,减少不必要的前列腺穿刺。

       

      Abstract: Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the prostate health index (PHI) and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score for prostate cancer when serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in the gray zone(4-10 μg/L), and to establish a prediction model for the combined diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods A total 131 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in Department of Urology at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from November 2022 to December 2023 were selected and their clinical data were collected. According to pathological results, the patients were divided into two groups: a prostate cancer group (n=35) and a benign prostatic hyperplasia group (n=96). The value of each variable for predicting prostate cancer was evaluated by binary logistic regression analysis, and a diagnosis model for predicting prostate cancer based on PHI combined with PI-RADS was established (Logit(P)). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for each independent variable and the prediction model Logit(P), and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. The optimal cutoff values for each factor and the prediction model Logit(P) were determined to evaluate their diagnostic performance. Results There were no statistical differences in age, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free prostate-specific antigen ratio (%fPSA), and prostate volume between the two groups (P>0.05). In contrast, significant differences were observed in PHI, prostate-specific antigen isoform 2 (p2PSA), and prostate health index density (PHID) (P<0.05). The AUCs for tPSA, %fPSA, p2PSA, PHI and PHID in diagnosing prostate cancer were 0.565, 0.634, 0.771, 0.812 and 0.802, respectively. The prediction model based on PHI combined with PI-RADS score was Logit(P)=1.117×PI-RADS score+0.086×PHI-7.886. The AUC of the predictive model Logit(P) was 0.848, which was significantly higher than that of each individual indicator (P<0.05). Conclusions PHI has superior diagnostic performance to traditional prostate cancer biomarkers in patients with serum PSA levels of 4-10 μg/L. The prediction model based on PHI combined with PI-RADS score has better diagnostic performance than the individual indicators, which can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis of prostate cancer and unnecessary prostate biopsies.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回