高级检索

    羟考酮在肥胖患者妇科腹腔镜手术多模式镇痛中的疗效观察

    Efficacy of oxycodone in multimodal analgesia for gynecological laparoscopic surgery in obese patients

    • 摘要: 目的 探究羟考酮静脉注射联合腹横肌平面阻滞多模式镇痛在肥胖患者妇科腹腔镜手术围术期的镇痛效果及安全性。方法 选取2023年1月—2024年3月徐州市妇幼保健院收治的择期行妇科腹腔镜手术的女性肥胖患者60例,随机分为羟考酮组和舒芬太尼组,每组30例。2组患者在麻醉监测下进行相同方式的双侧腹横肌平面阻滞。在麻醉诱导前,羟考酮组静脉注射羟考酮0.1 mg/kg,舒芬太尼组静脉注射舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg。2组患者麻醉诱导和术中全麻维持方案相同,手术结束前20 min时羟考酮组给予羟考酮0.1 mg/kg,舒芬太尼组给予舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg。记录2组患者手术时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间以及麻醉恢复室(PACU)治疗时间。记录PACU内拔管后不同时间点患者的Aldrete苏醒评分,观察并记录2组患者苏醒期间呼吸抑制、躁动、头晕以及恶心呕吐等不良反应发生情况。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分)评估并记录患者术后不同时间点的躯体痛和内脏痛情况。记录术后24 h内2组患者补救镇痛例数。结果 羟考酮组患者苏醒时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间和PACU治疗时间较舒芬太尼组短(P<0.05);PACU监测治疗期间,羟考酮组患者苏醒期呼吸抑制、躁动、恶心呕吐的发生率较舒芬太尼组低(P<0.05);PACU内拔管后各时间点,羟考酮组患者的Aldrete评分高于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05),离开PACU时间点2组患者Aldrete评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后各时间点,2组患者躯体痛VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2 h、6 h、12 h,羟考酮组患者内脏痛VAS评分低于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05)。羟考酮组患者术后24 h补救镇痛的百分比低于舒芬太尼组(P<0.05)。结论 羟考酮静脉注射联合腹横肌平面阻滞的多模式镇痛策略应用于肥胖患者妇科腹腔镜手术,患者苏醒快速且苏醒质量高,术后内脏痛镇痛效果好。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of intravenous oxycodone combined with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) for multimodal analgesia in obese patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery during the perioperative period. Methods A total of 60 female obese patients who were scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery at Xuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2023 to March 2024 were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups (n=30): an oxycodone group and a sufentanil group. Both groups underwent the same bilateral TAPB under anesthesia monitoring. Before anesthesia induction, the oxycodone group was intravenously injected with oxycodone at 0.1 mg/kg, while the sufentanil group received an intravenous injection of sufentanil at 0.1 μg/kg. The same anesthesia induction and intraoperative anesthesia maintenance protocols were performed in both groups. Then, 20 min before the end of the surgery, the oxycodone group received oxycodone at 0.1 mg/kg, while the sufentanil group was administered with sufentanil at 0.1 μg/kg. Their operation duration, time to emergence, time to extubation and time to recovery of orientation, and the length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay were recorded. The Aldrete scores at different time points after extubation in the PACU were recorded, and adverse reactions such as respiratory depression, agitation, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting during emergence were observed and recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores was used to assess the somatic and visceral pain at different postoperative time points. The number of cases requiring rescue analgesia within 24 h after surgery was recorded. Results The oxycodone group showed shorter times to emergence, extubation and orientation recovery, and length of PACU stay than the sufentanil group (P<0.05). During the PACU monitoring period, the oxycodone group showed decreases in the incidences of respiratore depression, agitation, nausea, and vomiting, compared with the sufentanil group (P<0.05). Within the PACU, the oxycodone group showed higher Aldrete scores than the sufentanil group at each post- extubation time points (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference in Aldrete scores at the time of discharge from the PACU between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in VAS scores for somatic pain at each postoperative time point between the two groups (P>0.05). At post-operative 2 h, 6 h and 12 h, the VAS scores for visceral pain in the oxycodone group were lower than those in the sufentanil group (P<0.05). The percentage of cases requiring rescue analgesia within 24 h after surgery in the oxycodone group decreased, compared with the sufentanil group (P<0.05). Conclusions The multimodal analgesia strategy of intravenous oxycodone combined with TAPB can be applied in obese patients during gynecological laparoscopic surgery, with fast and high-quality emergence and effective postoperative analgesia for visceral pain.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回