高级检索

    AECOPD患者发生呼吸衰竭风险预测模型的建立与验证

    Development and validation of a risk prediction model for respiratory failure in AECOPD patients

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者发生呼吸衰竭(RF)的危险因素,构建预测模型,并评价其有效性。方法 回顾性分析2023年4月—2024年8月徐州医科大学附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科收治的460例AECOPD患者的临床资料。按照入院时间顺序,将患者以约7∶3的比例分为训练组(2023年4月—2024年3月,323例)和验证组(2024年4月—2024年8月,137例)。根据是否发生RF,将训练组患者分为AECOPD组(147例)和RF组(176例)。通过单因素及多因素logistic回归筛选独立影响因素,并构建列线图模型。进一步绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)及临床影响曲线(CIC),评价模型效能及临床实用性。结果 糖尿病、红细胞分布宽度标准差(RDW-SD)、预后营养指数(PNI)和中性粒细胞百分比与血清白蛋白比值(NPAR)是AECOPD患者发生RF的独立危险因素(P≤0.05)。基于上述4个预测因子构建预测模型并绘制列线图。通过ROC曲线分析模型在训练组的AUC为0.839(95%CI:0.797~0.881),验证组的AUC为0.806(95%CI:0.734~0.878)。2组的校准曲线贴近理想曲线,Hosmer-Lemeshow检验P>0.05,表明预测结果与实际结果良好的一致性。决策曲线和临床影响曲线显示模型具有较好的临床实用性。结论 基于糖尿病、RDW-SD、PNI和NPAR构建的列线图在预测RF方面表现出较好的准确性和临床实用价值,是一种更适合基层医院评估AECOPD患者发生RF风险的简便、经济的方法。

       

      Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors for respiratory failure (RF) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), construct a prediction model, and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 460 AECOPD patients who were admitted to Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, from April 2023 to August 2024. According to admission time, the patients were divided into two groups in a 7:3 ratio: a training group (n=323, April 2023 to March 2024) and a validation group (n=137, April 2024 to August 2024). Based on whether respiratory failure occurred, the training group was further divided into an AECOPD group (n=147) and an RF group (n=176). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model's performance and clinical utility were assessed through plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC) analysis. Results Diabetes, red blood cell distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and neutrophil percentage to serum albumin ratio (NPAR) were identified as independent risk factors for RF in AECOPD patients (P≤0.05). A prediction model was constructed based on these four factors, and a nomogram was plotted. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC in the training group was 0.839 (95%CI: 0.797-0.881), and 0.806 (95%CI: 0.734-0.878) in the validation group. The calibration curves for both groups were approximated to the ideal curve, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P>0.05) indicated a good consistency between predicted and actual results. Decision curve and clinical impact curves demonstrated that the model has good clinical utility. Conclusions The nomogram constructed based on diabetes, RDW-SD, PNI, and NPAR demonstrates good accuracy and clinical utility in predicting RF. It is a simple and cost-effective method suitable for primary hospitals to assess the risk of RF in AECOPD patients.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回