高级检索

    气管内滴注肺表面活性剂联合布地奈德治疗新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征的队列研究

    Intratracheal instillation of pulmonary surfactant combined with budesonide for the treatment of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study

    • 摘要: 目的 通过比较气管内滴注肺表面活性剂(PS)或联合布地奈德在不同病因引起的新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(NARDS)治疗中的临床疗效及不良反应,以探讨治疗NARDS新方法。方法 选择2022年10月—2024年11月徐州市中心医院收治的符合蒙特勒标准的NARDS患儿进行对照研究,随机分为PS组(气管内滴注PS)和PSB组(气管内滴注PS联合布地奈德)。组内分为直接因素亚组和间接因素亚组。比较吸入氧浓度、氧合指数、呼吸支持时间、再次使用PS、激素相关并发症等指标。结果 PS组共42例,PSB组共44例。PSB组给药后12 h和24 h 氧合指数均小于PS组(P<0.05)。2组患儿吸入氧浓度、PS再次使用率、呼吸支持天数、激素相关并发症等短期疗效及不良结局等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PS组内间接肺损伤因素亚组给药12 h、24 h后吸入氧浓度均大于直接肺损伤因素亚组,PS再次使用率高于、呼吸支持天数和住院天数少于直接肺损伤因素亚组(P<0.05)。PSB组内间接肺损伤因素亚组给药后12 h、24 h氧合指数和吸入氧浓度均大于直接肺损伤因素亚组,PS再次使用率高于、呼吸支持天数和住院天数少于直接肺损伤因素亚组(P<0.05)。PSB组直接肺损伤因素亚组给药后12 h和24 h氧合指数、给药后24 h吸入氧浓度、住院天数均明显小于PS组直接肺损伤因素亚组(P<0.05)。2组间接肺损伤因素亚组临床疗效及不良结局指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与单用PS相比,PS联合布地奈德气管内滴注治疗NARDS,可更有效减轻肺损伤,尤其对直接肺损伤因素导致的NARDS肺损伤,且能加快恢复,同时未增加激素相关并发症及短期不良结局的发生风险。

       

      Abstract: Objective To explore a new approach for treating neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) by comparing the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of intratracheal instillation of pulmonary surfactant (PS) alone or in combination with budesonide in NARDS of different etiologies. Methods A controlled study was conducted on children with NARDS who were admitted to Xuzhou Central Hospital from October 2022 to November 2024 and met the Montreux criteria. They were randomly divided into two groups: a PS group (intratracheal instillation of PS) and a PSB group (intratracheal instillation of PS + budesonide). Each group was further divided into subgroups based on direct or indirect etiological factors. Parameters including fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), oxygenation index (OI), duration of respiratory support, repeated PS use, and steroid-related adverse complications were compared. Results A total of 42 cases were included in the PS group and 44 cases in the PSB group. The OI at 12 h and 24 h after administration was lower in the PSB group than in the PS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of FiO2, repeat PS use rate, duration of respiratory support, or short-term efficacy and steroid-related adverse outcomes (P>0.05). Within the PS group, the FiO2 at 12 h and 24 h after administration and the repeat PS use rate in the indirect lung injury subgroup were higher than those in the direct lung injury subgroup, while the duration of respiratory support and length of hospitalization stay were shorter than in the direct lung injury subgroup (P<0.05).Within the PSB group, the OI and FiO2 at 12 h and 24 h after administration and the repeat PS use rate in the indirect lung injury subgroup were higher than those in the direct lung injury subgroup, while the duration of respiratory support and length of hospitalization stay were shorter than in the direct lung injury subgroup (P<0.05). In the direct lung injury subgroup, the OI at 12 h and 24 h after administration, FiO2 at 24 h after administration, and the length of hospitalization stay in the PSB group were all significantly lower than those in the PS group (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy or adverse outcomes between the indirect lung injury subgroups of the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions With PS alone, intratracheal instillation of PS combined with budesonide for NARDS can more effectively attenuate lung injury, which may mainly reduce the lung injury caused by direct lung injury factors in NARDS, and accelerate its recovery, without increasing the risk of glucocorticoid-related complications and short-term adverse outcomes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回