高级检索

    免疫检查点抑制剂联合放化疗与单纯放化疗在局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌治疗中复发模式的对比研究

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in the treatment of recurrence patterns in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

    • 摘要: 目的 比较免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合放化疗与单纯放化疗治疗局部晚期、不可手术食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的复发模式及生存结局差异。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月—2023年12月于徐州医科大学附属医院接受初始治疗的局部晚期、不可手术ESCC患者167例。根据治疗方案将患者分为免疫组(n=81)和非免疫组(n=86),比较复发模式和生存结局。按免疫治疗与放化疗的时序,在全人群中比较同步放化免组(n=29)和同步放化组(n=31)的复发模式。在免疫组内,根据免疫治疗介入时序分为放疗前组(n=30)、放疗中组(n=29)和放疗后组(n=22),比较复发模式。结果 全人群中,免疫组与非免疫组最常见的复发类型均为局部复发,但免疫组复发率显著低于非免疫组(39.5% vs 57.0%,P=0.024)。非免疫组非区域淋巴结复发比例更高(13.6% vs 26.7%,P=0.035)。生存分析显示,免疫组中位无进展生存在(PFS)显著长于非免疫组(29.5 vs 10.5个月,P<0.001);总生存期(OS)呈延长趋势但无统计学意义(P=0.072)。免疫组2年OS率显著高于非免疫组(P<0.05)。亚组分析显示,同步放化免组与同步放化组、以及免疫组内不同免疫介入时序间的复发模式差异均无统计学意义(P<0.005)。结论 与单纯放化疗相比,ICI联合放化疗可显著降低局部晚期不可手术ESCC患者局部及非区域淋巴结复发风险,并显著延长PFS,OS亦呈获益趋势。

       

      Abstract: Objective To compare the recurrence patterns and survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced, inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on 167 patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC who received initial treatment at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2023. According to the treatment regimen, the patients were divided into an immune group (n=81) and a non-immune group (n=86). Recurrence patterns and survival outcomes were compared. In the whole population, the recurrence patterns of the synchronous chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group (n=29) and the synchronous chemoradiotherapy group (n=31) were compared. Within the immune group, patients were further divided based on the timing of immune therapy relative to radiotherapy into a pre-radiotherapy group (n=30), a during-radiotherapy group (n=29), and a post-radiotherapy group (n=22), and recurrence patterns were compared. Results In the whole population, the most common recurrence type in both the immune and non-immune groups was primary local recurrence, but the recurrence rate in the immune group was significantly lower than in the non-immune group (39.5% vs 57.0%, P=0.024). The non-immune group had a higher proportion of isolated non-regional lymph node recurrence (13.6% vs 26.7%, P=0.035). Survival analysis showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the immune group was significantly longer than in the non-immune group (29.5 vs 10.5 months, P<0.001). The overall survival (OS) showed an extended trend in the immune group, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.072). The 2-year OS rates in the immune group were significantly higher than in the non-immune group (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in recurrence patterns between the synchronous chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group and the synchronous chemoradiotherapy group, as well as among different immune intervention timings within the immune group. Conclusions Compared to chemoradiotherapy alone, ICIs combined with chemoradiotherapy significantly reduces the risk of local and non-regional lymph node recurrence and significantly prolongs PFS in patients with locally advanced, inoperable ESCC, with a trend toward improvement in OS.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回