高级检索

    腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除联合双通道术治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病的疗效比较

    Comparison of the efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus

    • 摘要: 目的 比较腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)与袖状胃切除联合双通道术(SG-TB)治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的疗效。方法 回顾性纳入徐州医科大学附属医院2022年2月—2024年12月收治的肥胖合并T2DM患者的临床资料,根据手术方案分为LRYGB组(80例)和SG-TB组(87例)。比较两组手术相关指标、术前胃食管反流病发生率、术后30 d内并发症发生率、术前及术后6个月和12个月的肥胖相关指标体重、腰围、臀围、体质量指数(BMI)、多余体质量减少百分比(%EWL)、血糖糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)、空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2h血糖(2hPG)水平、血脂高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)水平。结果 SG-TB组手术、首次排气、进食、下床活动及住院时间短于LRYGB组,术中出血量少于LRYGB组(P<0.05)。两组术前胃食管反流病发生率及术后30 d内吻合口瘘、出血、肠梗阻发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SG-TB组术后30 d内胃食管反流病发生率为5.75%,低于LRYGB组的18.75%(P<0.05)。两组体重、腰围、臀围、BMI、%EWL、各血糖水平、各血脂水平无组间、交互差异(P>0.05)。与术前比较,两组术后6个月、12个月的体重、腰围、臀围、BMI、各血糖水平、TC、TG、LDL-C水平呈逐渐降低趋势,%EWL、HDL-C水平呈逐渐升高趋势(P<0.05)。结论 LRYGB与SG-TB治疗肥胖合并T2DM均可改善患者肥胖相关指标、血糖及血脂水平,且安全性均较高,但SG-TB更有利于缩短患者手术、首次排气、进食、下床活动及住院时间,减少术中出血量,且术后胃食管反流病发生率更低。

       

      Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG-TB) in the treatment of patients with obesity complicated by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods The clinical data of patients with obesity and T2DM who were treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between February 2022 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical procedure, the patients were divided into a LRYGB group (n=80) and a SG-TB group (n=87). Perioperative parameters, the preoperative incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the incidence of complications within 30 days after surgery were compared between the two groups. Obesity-related parameters, including body weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL); glycemic parameters, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hPG); and lipid parameters, including high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and total cholesterol (TC), were assessed before surgery and at 6 and 12 months after surgery.Results The SG-TB group had significantly shorter operative time, time to first flatus, time to oral intake, time to off-bed activity, and length of hospitalization stay than the LRYGB group, as well as significantly less intraoperative blood loss (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the preoperative incidence of GERD or the incidences of anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and intestinal obstruction within 30 days after surgery (all P>0.05). However, the incidence of GERD within 30 days after surgery was significantly lower in the SG-TB group than in the LRYGB group (5.75% vs. 18.75%, P<0.05). No significant between-group effects or group-by-time interaction effects were observed for body weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, BMI, %EWL, glycemic parameters, or lipid parameters (all P>0.05). Compared with preoperative values, body weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, 2hPG, TC, TG, and LDL-C showed progressive decreases at 6 and 12 months after surgery in both groups, whereas %EWL and HDL-C showed progressive increases (all P<0.05).Conclusions Both LRYGB and SG-TB can effectively improve obesity-related anthropometric parameters, glycemic control, and lipid profiles in patients with obesity and T2DM, with favorable short-term safety profiles. Compared with LRYGB, SG-TB is associated with shorter operative time, earlier recovery of gastrointestinal function and ambulation, shorter hospitalization stay, less intraoperative blood loss, and a lower incidence of postoperative GERD.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回