高级检索

    阿戈美拉汀对围绝经期失眠伴焦虑抑郁的临床研究

    Clinical study of agomelatine to treat insomnia in perimenopausal patients with anxiety and depression

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨阿戈美拉汀对围绝经期失眠伴焦虑抑郁患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法 将80例围绝经期失眠患者随机分为2组,每组40例,治疗组给予阿戈美拉汀治疗,对照组给予艾司唑仑治疗,观察6周。于治疗前后分别采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)及匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评定临床疗效,抗抑郁药副反应量表(SERS)评估不良反应。结果 治疗前,2组患者PSQI总分及各因子分,SAS、SDS分值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,治疗组患者PSQI总分及各因子分,SAS、SDS分值均下降,与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组在治疗后第2周、第6周SERS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 阿戈美拉汀对围绝经期失眠伴焦虑抑郁较艾司唑仑疗效更好,并且副作用少。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of agomelatine to treat insomnia in perimenopausal patients with anxiety and depression. Methods Eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=40): a treatment group and a control group. Patients in the treatment group received agomelatinem, while those in the control group were treated with estazolam for six weeks. Then, before and after treatment, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were adopted to evaluate clinical efficacy, while the Asberg's Side Effects Rating Scale (SERS) was used to assess adverse reactions. Results Before treatment, no statistical difference was found as to the scores of PSQI, SAS and SDS between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the treatment group presented remarkable decreases in the scores of PSQI, SAS and SDS compared with the control group, which was statistically different from those before treatment (P<0.05). The scores of SERS in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group at Weeks 2 and 6 (P<0.05). Conclusions Agomelatine is more effective than estazolam to treat insomnia in perimenopausal patients with anxiety and depression, with fewer adverse reactions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回