高级检索

    PD-1抑制剂联合地西他滨联合CAG方案治疗复发/难治性急性髓性白血病的临床疗效分析

    Clinical effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor and decitabine combined with CAG regimen in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia

    • 摘要: 目的 分析地西他滨联合CAG方案(阿糖胞苷+阿克拉霉素+粒细胞集落刺激因子,DCAG方案)联合程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂(替雷利珠单抗或信迪利单抗)治疗复发/难治性急性髓性白血病(AML)的临床疗效。 方法 收集徐州医科大学附属医院2018年1月—2021年5月诊断为复发/难治性AML的患者58例,其中DCAG方案组40例,PD-1抑制剂联合DCAG方案(P-DCAG)组18例,比较2组的客观缓解率(ORR)、并发症、生化指标及预后情况。结果 P-DCAG组中化疗次数≥5次的患者比例较DCAG组高,未接受移植的患者比例较DCAG组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组ORR、完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)、未缓解(NR)、1年无进展生存率、中位生存期和中位无进展生存期的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。P-DCAG组的中位生存期为17个月,而DCAG组为11个月。P-DCAG组的1年总生存率(77.78%)较DCAG组(52.50%)高(P<0.05)。在≥60岁的患者中,P-DCAG组的无进展生存期比DCAG组长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。P-DCAG组骨髓抑制发生率较DCAG组低(P<0.001)。结论 相较于DCAG方案,P-DCAG方案可以改善患者的总体预后,为老年AML的治疗提供了一种可能的选择。

       

      Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical effectiveness of decitabine combined with CAG regimen (cytanabine + acclarithromycin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, DCAG regimen) and programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (tirelizumab or sindilizumab) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods A total of 58 patients who were diagnosed with relapsed/refractory AML in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to May 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: a decitabine combined with CAG (DCAG) regimen group (n=40), and a PD-1 inhibitor combined with DCAG regimen (P-DCAG) group (n=18). The objective response rate (ORR), complications, biochemical indicators and prognosis of the two groups were compared between the two groups. Results In the P-DCAG group, the proportion of patients who received chemotherapy ≥five times was significantly higher than that in the DCAG group, while the proportion of patients not receiving transplantation was significantly lower than that in the DCAG group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in ORR, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no response (NR), 1-year progression-free survival, median overall survival and median progression-free survival between the two groups (P>0.05). The mean survival time was 17 months for the P-DCAG group and 11 months for the DCAG group. The 1-year overall survival rate in the P-DCAG group (77.78%) was higher than that in the DCAG group (52.50%). For patients aged ≥60 years, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the P-DCAG group was remarkably longer than that of the DCAG group (P<0.05). The P-DCAG group had a lower incidence of myelosuppression than the DCAG group (P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with DCAG regimen, P-DCAG regimen may improve the overall prognosis of patients, providing a possible option for the treatment of AML.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回