高级检索

    恩替卡韦或替诺福韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效观察

    Effect of entecavir or tenofovir combined with pegylated interferon α-2b in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B

    • 摘要: 目的 探究恩替卡韦(ETV)或替诺福韦(TDF)联合聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b(PEG-IFNα-2b)治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月-2022年1月就诊于徐州医科大学附属医院感染科的CHB患者共107例。其中57例患者采取ETV联合PEG-IFNα-2b治疗(ETV组),50例患者采取TDF联合PEG-IFNα-2b治疗(TDF组),比较2组患者治疗后血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)水平,及血清HBsAg、HBeAg阴转率。比较治疗后HBsAg阴转组(33例)与未阴转组(74例)在乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)抗原、肝功能及血常规指标等方面的差异,采取多因素logistic回归分析HBsAg阴转的独立影响因素。结果 ETV组与TDF组患者基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗12周、24周、36周、48周及停药后24周血清ALT、HBsAg、HBeAg中位数水平差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗24周、48周及停药后24周血清HBsAg、HBeAg阴转率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗后2组患者血清HBsAg、HBeAg中位数水平整体呈下降趋势;血清ALT中位数水平治疗12周较基线上升后呈下降趋势。基线HBeAg状态及HBsAg水平、治疗12周HBsAg水平、治疗12周HBsAg/基线HBsAg比值或基线WBC水平是HBsAg阴转的独立影响因素。结论 ETV或TDF联合PEG-IFNα-2b治疗CHB患者临床疗效相仿。基线HBeAg阴性、基线HBsAg低水平、治疗12周HBsAg低水平、治疗12周HBsAg/基线HBsAg低比值或基线WBC高水平的CHB患者治疗后HBsAg阴转率更高。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF) combined with pegylated interferon α-2b (PEG-IFNα-2b) in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).Methods A total of 107 CHB patients who were admitted to Department of Infectious Diseases, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2019 to January 2022 were enrolled and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 57 patients were treated with ETV combined with PEG-IFNα-2b, which was set as an ETV group, while 50 patients were administered with TDF combined with PEG-IFNα-2b, which was set as a TDF group. After treatment, the two groups were compared for serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), as well as the negative conversion rate of serum HBsAg and HBeAg. After treatment, the HBsAg negative conversion group (n=33) and the non-negative conversion group (n=74) were compared for the differences of hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigen, liver function and blood routine indexes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the independent influencing factors of HBsAg negative conversion.Results There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the ETV and TDF groups (P>0.05). The differences in median serum ALT, HBsAg and HBeAg levels at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The differences in serum HBsAg and HBeAg negative conversion rates at 24 and 48 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). After treatment, the two groups showed a decreasing trend in the median serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels as a whole, while their median serum ALT levels were elevated at 12 weeks of treatment and then declined, compared with the baseline data. Baseline HBeAg status and HBsAg level, HBsAg level at 12 weeks of treatment, the ratio of HBsAg level at 12 weeks of treatment/baseline HBsAg and baseline WBC level were the independent influencing factors for HBsAg negative conversion.Conclusions ETV or TDF in combination with PEG-IFNα-2b has similar clinical effectiveness for the treatment of PEG-IFNα-2b. After treatment, CHB patients with negative baseline HBeAg, low baseline HBsAg level, low HBsAg level at 12 weeks of treatment, a low ratio of HBsAg level at 12 weeks of treatment/baseline HBsAg, or high baseline WBC level show a higher HBsAg negative conversion rate.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回