高级检索
    赵惠娟, 戴园园. 拉考沙胺单药治疗对局灶性癫痫合并抑郁患儿外周血IL-6及5-HT表达的影响[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2024, 44(6): 442-446. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2024.06.009
    引用本文: 赵惠娟, 戴园园. 拉考沙胺单药治疗对局灶性癫痫合并抑郁患儿外周血IL-6及5-HT表达的影响[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2024, 44(6): 442-446. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2024.06.009
    ZHAO Huijuan, DAI Yuanyuan. Effect of lacosamide monotherapy on peripheral blood IL-6 and 5-HT expression in teenagers with focal epilepsy combined with depression[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2024, 44(6): 442-446. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2024.06.009
    Citation: ZHAO Huijuan, DAI Yuanyuan. Effect of lacosamide monotherapy on peripheral blood IL-6 and 5-HT expression in teenagers with focal epilepsy combined with depression[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2024, 44(6): 442-446. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2024.06.009

    拉考沙胺单药治疗对局灶性癫痫合并抑郁患儿外周血IL-6及5-HT表达的影响

    Effect of lacosamide monotherapy on peripheral blood IL-6 and 5-HT expression in teenagers with focal epilepsy combined with depression

    • 摘要: 目的 探讨拉考沙胺单药治疗对局灶性癫痫合并抑郁患儿外周血白细胞介素-6(IL-6)及5-羟色胺(5-HT)表达的影响。方法 选择2022年6月—2023年1月就诊于徐州医科大学附属医院且初次诊断为局灶性癫痫的12~18岁青少年,进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分。将评分≥8分(有抑郁倾向)的患儿纳入研究,共116例,分为2组,拉考沙胺组53例,口服拉考沙胺,奥卡西平组63例,口服奥卡西平。治疗6个月及12个月后进行随访,观察癫痫控制总有效率、HAMD评分、外周血IL-6及5-HT水平和药物不良反应发生情况。结果 拉考沙胺组治疗6个月癫痫控制总有效率为64.71%,与奥卡西平组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);拉考沙胺组治疗12个月癫痫控制总有效率为89.13%,高于奥卡西平组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组间治疗前、治疗6个月及12个月后HAMD评分、IL-6、5-HT水平差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。拉考沙胺组治疗6个月、12个月后HAMD评分、IL-6水平低于治疗前,5-HT水平高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。拉考沙胺组治疗12个月后不良反应发生率为15.09%,低于奥卡西平组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 拉考沙胺单药治疗青少年局灶性癫痫合并抑郁可有效控制癫痫发作,改善患儿抑郁症状,可能与降低IL-6及升高5-HT有关,且不良反应发生率较低。

       

      Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of lacosamide monotherapy on peripheral blood interleukin-6 (IL-6) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) expression in teenagers with focal epilepsy combined with depression. Methods Teenagers, aged 12-18 years, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and initially diagnosed with focal epilepsy from June 2022 to January 2023 were enrolled. Their Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were evaluated and those with a score of ≥8 points (with a tendency to depression) were included in the study. A total of 116 patients were included and divided into two groups: a lacosamide group (oral administration with lacosamide, n=53) and a oxcarbazepine group (oral administration with oxcarbazepine, n=63). Follow-ups were conducted at post-treatment 6 and 12 months, and the overall effective rate of epilepsy control, HAMD scores, peripheral blood IL-6 and 5-HT levels and adverse reactions were observed. Results The total effective rate of epilepsy control in the lacosamide group was 64.71% at post-treatment 6 months, without statistical difference compared with the oxcarbazepine group (P>0.05). The total effective rate of epilepsy control in the lacosamide group was 89.13% at post-treatment 12 months, which was higher than that in the oxcarbazepine group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). No statistical difference was found in HAMD scores, and IL-6 and 5-HT levels before and 6 and 12 months after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). The lacosamide group showed remarkable decreases in HAMD scores and IL-6 levels and increases in 5-HT levels at post-treatment 6 and 12 months, compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions at post-treatment 12 months was 15.09% in the lacosamide group, which was lower than that in the oxcarbazepine group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusions Lacosamide monotherapy is effective to control seizures for teenagers with focal epilepsy combined with depression and improve their depressive symptoms, which may be related to reduction of IL-6 and elevation of 5-HT, with a low incidence of adverse reactions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回