高级检索

    心理治疗对围退休期抑郁、焦虑症状的疗效观察

    Effect of psychological intervention on depression and anxiety in elderly patients during peri-retirement period

    • 摘要: 目的 观察心理治疗对于围退休期抑郁、焦虑症状的治疗效果。方法 在淮安市筛选存在抑郁、焦虑症状的围退休期老人为研究对象,随机分为心理治疗组和药物治疗组,心理治疗组针对患者的现实冲突给予综合性心理治疗,药物治疗组采用草酸艾司西酞普兰20 mg/d治疗,12周后采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)比较两组间疗效。结果 基线时两组间SDS评分、SAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,心理治疗组SAS减分高于药物治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SDS减分略高于药物治疗组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。受教育年限较高、脑力劳动者、有配偶者,接受心理治疗后SDS和SAS评分减分更多,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 心理干预可以有效治疗围退休期老人的抑郁、焦虑症状。

       

      Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of psychological intervention on depression and anxiety in elderly patients during peri-retirement period. Methods The elderly persons around the time of retirement were screened for the depressive and anxious symptoms in the Huai’an city and randomly divided into psychological therapy (PT) group and escitalopram treatment (ET) group. The PT group was given a comprehensive psychotherapy according to the realistic conflict faced by the patients, while the ET group was administrated with escitalopram (20 mg/d). After 12 weeks of treatment, the efficacy of the two groups was compared by the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Results A comparison of baseline showed that there was no significant difference in SDS and SAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the SAS score in the PT group was significantly reduced than that in the ET group (P<0.05). The SDS score was slightly reduced in the PT group compared with the ET group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The scores of SDS and SAS decreased more in those with longer educational years and mental workers as well as with spousal companion after psychotherapy (P<0.05). Conclusions Psychological intervention can effectively treat elderly patients with symptoms of depression and anxiety during peri-retirement period.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回