Advanced Search
WANG Rong, LU Jiao, ZHUO Baobiao. Comparison of virtual touch tissue imaging area ratio with virtual touch tissue quantification in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(2): 133-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.02.013
Citation: WANG Rong, LU Jiao, ZHUO Baobiao. Comparison of virtual touch tissue imaging area ratio with virtual touch tissue quantification in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions[J]. Journal of Xuzhou Medical University, 2020, 40(2): 133-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3882.2020.02.013

Comparison of virtual touch tissue imaging area ratio with virtual touch tissue quantification in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions

More Information
  • Received Date: November 15, 2017
  • Revised Date: February 23, 2018
  • Objective To evaluate the area ratio of virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) and virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Methods VTI and VTQ were performed in 68 patientswith 76 breast lesions. The area ratio of VTI and gray-scale images in breast lesions and shear wave velocity (SWV) in the lesions were obtained. Based on pathological findings, the ROC curves of VTI area ratio and SWV were constructed. The area under the curves was analyzed, while their corresponding optimal cut-off to differentially diagnose benign and malignant breast lesions was determined. Results There were no significant differences between the area under the ROC curves of VTI area ratio and SWV. The cut-off of rea ratio was no less than 1.52, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 92.6%. The cut-off of SWV was no less than 3.76 m/s, was a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 94.5%. Conclusions Both VTI area ratio and VTQ can be adopted for differential diagnosis of breast lesions without statistical differences in diagnostic efficiency.
  • [1]
    王彬, 李发琪. 声辐射力弹性成像: 弹性成像的新发展[J]. 中国医学影像技术. 2011, 27(4): 852-856.
    [2]
    程祥勇, 曲国田, 陈晓慧. 声触诊成像面积比值法与评分法鉴别乳腺良恶性病灶价值比较[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2015, 25(11): 1953-1956.
    [3]
    白敏, 陈惠莉, 张雪梅, 等. 声触诊组织量化技术在鉴别乳腺良恶性病灶中的应用[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1080-1082.
    [4]
    吴长君, 张光晨, 孟巍, 等. 声触诊组织量化技术鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2011, 20(11): 965-967.
    [5]
    Thomas A, Kummel S, Fritzsche F, et al. Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-mode ultrasound and mammography: improved differentiation of breast lesions? [J]. Acad Radiol, 2006, 13(12): 1496-1504.
    [6]
    Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK, et al. Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules [J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193(5): W416-W423. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2541.
    [7]
    宫霞, 王怡, 王涌, 等. 超声弹性成像面积比在鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2012, 18(6): 535-537.
    [8]
    Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(2): 227-235.
    [9]
    吴芳, 崔凤荣, 芦桂林, 等. 联合声触诊组织成像及组织量化技术鉴别诊断乳腺肿块[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(9): 775-778.
    [10]
    李振彩, 张晶, 胡冬梅, 等. 声触诊组织定量技术在鉴别诊断乳腺良、恶性病灶中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2012, 9(5): 457-459. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2012.05.019.
    [11]
    欧冰, 智慧, 杨海云, 等. 比较声触诊组织量化与弹性应变率比值法诊断乳腺疾病[J].中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(10): 1835-1838.

Catalog

    Article views (862) PDF downloads (1379) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return